<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint Nextel Putting the Screws to AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/</link>
	<description>Just a bunch of fans talking about racing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob racer</title>
		<link>http://www.vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>bob racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Pretty apparent from this article that RCR knew all along--was it his greed that led to this?

Wednesday, March 28, 2007
NASCAR fires back at AT&amp;T in legal battle

by Mike Mulhern
JOURNAL REPORTER

AT&amp;T has been pressuring NASCAR with its lawsuit over how to paint the quarter panels on Jeff Burton&#039;s Nextel Cup car as it rebrands Cingular under the AT&amp;T logo.

According to papers being filed in the suit, NASCAR officials told Stan Sigman, the president and CEO of Cingular, five weeks ago that in April 2005, George Pyne, NASCAR&#039;s CEO at the time, told the Richard Childress-Burton team that it would not allow a change in paint scheme or logos if Cingular was bought and had its name changed.

NASCAR further said that its grandfathering of Cingular - after Nextel signed on as the series sponsor - &quot;was tied directly to the Cingular Wireless brand and not the Cingular company.&quot;

The papers further say that &quot;it is generally not in NASCAR&#039;s interest to limit sponsors&#039; participation in the sport.&quot; NASCAR suggested that AT&amp;T could sponsor a Busch team or a Trucks team instead, if it wished. That is precisely the route that Verizon has taken.

NASCAR&#039;s filing refers specifically to Pyne&#039;s letter to Childress, dated April 4, 2005. It specifies that &quot;should Cingular be acquired by a third party, the Cingular brand is continually welcome as a team sponsor. However, should the company&#039;s name change, we will not allow any paint scheme or branding on the car promoting this new name.&quot;

The papers go on to say: &quot;NASCAR certainly has no desire to eliminate the Cingular brand from NASCAR Nextel Cup series competition.&quot; But, &quot;unfortunately AT&amp;T&#039;s decision to purchase Cingular and then to eliminate the Cingular brand puts NASCAR in the position of having to now enforce the rights granted Nextel in the series sponsorship agreement.&quot;

NASCAR and Nextel signed their initial agreements in the summer of 2003, with Nextel taking over the sponsorship from R. J. Reynolds for the start of the 2004 season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty apparent from this article that RCR knew all along&#8211;was it his greed that led to this?</p>
<p>Wednesday, March 28, 2007<br />
NASCAR fires back at AT&amp;T in legal battle</p>
<p>by Mike Mulhern<br />
JOURNAL REPORTER</p>
<p>AT&amp;T has been pressuring NASCAR with its lawsuit over how to paint the quarter panels on Jeff Burton&#8217;s Nextel Cup car as it rebrands Cingular under the AT&amp;T logo.</p>
<p>According to papers being filed in the suit, NASCAR officials told Stan Sigman, the president and CEO of Cingular, five weeks ago that in April 2005, George Pyne, NASCAR&#8217;s CEO at the time, told the Richard Childress-Burton team that it would not allow a change in paint scheme or logos if Cingular was bought and had its name changed.</p>
<p>NASCAR further said that its grandfathering of Cingular &#8211; after Nextel signed on as the series sponsor &#8211; &#8220;was tied directly to the Cingular Wireless brand and not the Cingular company.&#8221;</p>
<p>The papers further say that &#8220;it is generally not in NASCAR&#8217;s interest to limit sponsors&#8217; participation in the sport.&#8221; NASCAR suggested that AT&amp;T could sponsor a Busch team or a Trucks team instead, if it wished. That is precisely the route that Verizon has taken.</p>
<p>NASCAR&#8217;s filing refers specifically to Pyne&#8217;s letter to Childress, dated April 4, 2005. It specifies that &#8220;should Cingular be acquired by a third party, the Cingular brand is continually welcome as a team sponsor. However, should the company&#8217;s name change, we will not allow any paint scheme or branding on the car promoting this new name.&#8221;</p>
<p>The papers go on to say: &#8220;NASCAR certainly has no desire to eliminate the Cingular brand from NASCAR Nextel Cup series competition.&#8221; But, &#8220;unfortunately AT&amp;T&#8217;s decision to purchase Cingular and then to eliminate the Cingular brand puts NASCAR in the position of having to now enforce the rights granted Nextel in the series sponsorship agreement.&#8221;</p>
<p>NASCAR and Nextel signed their initial agreements in the summer of 2003, with Nextel taking over the sponsorship from R. J. Reynolds for the start of the 2004 season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob racer</title>
		<link>http://www.vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>bob racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Wake up- Winston - RJR keep all tobacco sponosrs out of all divisions of NASCAR for 33 years--why do you think Marlboro was in Indy and F1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up- Winston &#8211; RJR keep all tobacco sponosrs out of all divisions of NASCAR for 33 years&#8211;why do you think Marlboro was in Indy and F1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gvav1</title>
		<link>http://www.vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Gvav1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vroomchatter.com/2007/01/27/sprint-nextel-putting-the-screws-to-att/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Just found your blog...vroom!

Sprint or Nextel or whatever their name is, should have confidence in their brand and welcome the AT&amp;T brand into Cup racing. Big sponsors are hard to find these days.

I&#039;ll add you to my blog roll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found your blog&#8230;vroom!</p>
<p>Sprint or Nextel or whatever their name is, should have confidence in their brand and welcome the AT&amp;T brand into Cup racing. Big sponsors are hard to find these days.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll add you to my blog roll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
